In the past decade, women's health information has become more prevalent in American media and scholarship, yet little of this information has focused on women's opinions about their health. I am interested in your opinions about women's health, the media, and body image, and I am conducting an on-line survey about these important topics.
I am especially interested in gaining the opinions of women who have experienced menopause.
It would be great if you could take 20 to 30 minutes of your time to offer your valued opinion. Participants who complete the survey will be entered into two raffles, each for an opportunity to win $50.
I am an Assistant Professor in the Edward R. Murrow School of Communication at Washington State University. This project has been reviewed and approved for human participation by the Washington State University Institutional Review Board to ensure this research is conducted in an ethical manner.
It would be great if you could take 20 to 30 minutes of your time to> offer your valued opinion. Participants who complete the survey will be> entered into two raffles, each for an opportunity to win $50.>
I am an Assistant Professor in the Edward R. Murrow School of> Communication at Washington State University. This project has been> reviewed and approved for human participation by the Washington State> University Institutional Review Board to ensure this research is> conducted in an ethical manner.>
I don't think I'd mind too much taking such a survey, but 20-30 minutes is a hell of a long survey. And the fact that this researcher is from a school of communications? I keep wondering, what's the point?
Then again, I'm not sure who I think *should* be conducting such a survey. I guess I pass.
If anybody else does it, will you let us know how it goes?
Chak
-- In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. --George Orwell
Chakolate wrote:> "stacey" <sjhust@mail.wsu.edu> wrote in news:1155313328.980450.301690@> 75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:>
It would be great if you could take 20 to 30 minutes of your time to>> offer your valued opinion. Participants who complete the survey will be>> entered into two raffles, each for an opportunity to win $50.>>
I am an Assistant Professor in the Edward R. Murrow School of>> Communication at Washington State University. This project has been>> reviewed and approved for human participation by the Washington State>> University Institutional Review Board to ensure this research is>> conducted in an ethical manner.>>
I don't think I'd mind too much taking such a survey, but 20-30 minutes > is a hell of a long survey. And the fact that this researcher is from a > school of communications? I keep wondering, what's the point? >
Then again, I'm not sure who I think *should* be conducting such a > survey. I guess I pass.>
If anybody else does it, will you let us know how it goes?
It took me less than 10 minutes.
Many of the questions were in regard to media sources of information about health, which sources I use, how much reliance I place on them, whether I double check reports. Several questions about WHI and HPV vaccinations. Opinions on cultural and media influences on physical attractiveness. Demographic information.
I thought it was fairly reasonable, though I didn't like the way some questions were asked. But then I usually find a few to object to in any survey.
"Chakolate" <chakolateDeathToSpammers@gmail.com> wrote in message news:Xns981C7B39A342Achakolatehotmailcom@204.153.244.170...> "stacey" <sjhust@mail.wsu.edu> wrote in news:1155313328.980450.301690@> 75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:>
It would be great if you could take 20 to 30 minutes of your time to>> offer your valued opinion. Participants who complete the survey will be>> entered into two raffles, each for an opportunity to win $50.>>
I am an Assistant Professor in the Edward R. Murrow School of>> Communication at Washington State University. This project has been>> reviewed and approved for human participation by the Washington State>> University Institutional Review Board to ensure this research is>> conducted in an ethical manner.>>
I don't think I'd mind too much taking such a survey, but 20-30 minutes> is a hell of a long survey.
Yeah, that was my reaction.
And the fact that this researcher is from a> school of communications?
I assume this goes back to her first paragraph, re: the media.
Cathy
I keep wondering, what's the point?>
Then again, I'm not sure who I think *should* be conducting such a> survey. I guess I pass.>
If anybody else does it, will you let us know how it goes?>
Chak>
-- > In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.> --George Orwell
"FurPaw" <furrealpawdog@gmail.com> wrote in message news:CpadnTcGDNUKVEHZnZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@comcast.com...> Chakolate wrote:>> "stacey" <sjhust@mail.wsu.edu> wrote in news:1155313328.980450.301690@>> 75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:>>
It would be great if you could take 20 to 30 minutes of your time to>>> offer your valued opinion. Participants who complete the survey will be>>> entered into two raffles, each for an opportunity to win $50.>>>
I am an Assistant Professor in the Edward R. Murrow School of>>> Communication at Washington State University. This project has been>>> reviewed and approved for human participation by the Washington State>>> University Institutional Review Board to ensure this research is>>> conducted in an ethical manner.>>>
I don't think I'd mind too much taking such a survey, but 20-30 minutes >> is a hell of a long survey. And the fact that this researcher is from a >> school of communications? I keep wondering, what's the point? Then >> again, I'm not sure who I think *should* be conducting such a survey. I >> guess I pass.>>
If anybody else does it, will you let us know how it goes?>
It took me less than 10 minutes.
I didn't time it, but my guess is ~15 minutes.
Many of the questions were in regard to media sources of information about > health, which sources I use, how much reliance> I place on them, whether I double check reports. Several questions about > WHI and HPV vaccinations. Opinions on cultural and media influences on > physical attractiveness. Demographic information.>
I thought it was fairly reasonable, though I didn't like the way some > questions were asked. But then I usually find a few to object to in any > survey.
FurPaw <furrealpawdog@gmail.com> wrote in news:CpadnTcGDNUKVEHZnZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@comcast.com:
I thought it was fairly reasonable, though I didn't like the way > some questions were asked. But then I usually find a few to > object to in any survey.>
Isn't that the truth? Some surveys you can't answer any of the questions because the options are so limited.
Thanks for the assessment, Furry. I think I'll meander over there later.
Chak
-- In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. --George Orwell
FurPaw <furrealpawdog@gmail.com> wrote in news:CpadnTcGDNUKVEHZnZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@comcast.com:
I thought it was fairly reasonable, though I didn't like the way > some questions were asked. But then I usually find a few to > object to in any survey.>
It took me about 15 minutes, so not too bad. Also, you're right that the questions were pretty reasonable. There were only a few that I wished I could clarify my answer.
Chak
-- In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. --George Orwell
Keera Ann Fox 12 August 2006 11:26:10 [ permanent link ]
FurPaw <furrealpawdog@gmail.com> wrote:
Many of the questions were in regard to media sources of > information about health, which sources I use, how much reliance> I place on them, whether I double check reports. Several > questions about WHI and HPV vaccinations. Opinions on cultural > and media influences on physical attractiveness. Demographic > information.
Is the test US-centric? I'm guessing it is since it asks about HPV vaccinations.
"Keera Ann Fox" <thinkbig.shrinktofit@online.no> wrote in message news:1hjya4i.c14hgl1j3krxnN%thinkbig.shrinktofit@online.no...> FurPaw <furrealpawdog@gmail.com> wrote:>
Many of the questions were in regard to media sources of>> information about health, which sources I use, how much reliance>> I place on them, whether I double check reports. Several>> questions about WHI and HPV vaccinations. Opinions on cultural>> and media influences on physical attractiveness. Demographic>> information.>
Is the test US-centric? I'm guessing it is since it asks about HPV> vaccinations.
Priscilla Ballou 13 August 2006 02:17:51 [ permanent link ]
In article <CpadnTcGDNUKVEHZnZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@comcast.com>, FurPaw <furrealpawdog@gmail.com> wrote:
Chakolate wrote:> > "stacey" <sjhust@mail.wsu.edu> wrote in news:1155313328.980450.301690@> > 75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:> >
It would be great if you could take 20 to 30 minutes of your time to> >> offer your valued opinion. Participants who complete the survey will be> >> entered into two raffles, each for an opportunity to win $50.> >>
I am an Assistant Professor in the Edward R. Murrow School of> >> Communication at Washington State University. This project has been> >> reviewed and approved for human participation by the Washington State> >> University Institutional Review Board to ensure this research is> >> conducted in an ethical manner.> >>
I don't think I'd mind too much taking such a survey, but 20-30 minutes > > is a hell of a long survey. And the fact that this researcher is from a > > school of communications? I keep wondering, what's the point? > >
Then again, I'm not sure who I think *should* be conducting such a > > survey. I guess I pass.> >
If anybody else does it, will you let us know how it goes?>
It took me less than 10 minutes.>
Many of the questions were in regard to media sources of > information about health, which sources I use, how much reliance> I place on them, whether I double check reports. Several > questions about WHI and HPV vaccinations. Opinions on cultural > and media influences on physical attractiveness. Demographic > information.>
I thought it was fairly reasonable, though I didn't like the way > some questions were asked. But then I usually find a few to > object to in any survey.>
FurPaw
Books were not listed as an information source! Yikes!
"Priscilla Ballou" <vze23t8n@verizon.net> wrote in message news:vze23t8n-0000A1.18175112082006@individual.net...> In article <CpadnTcGDNUKVEHZnZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@comcast.com>,> FurPaw <furrealpawdog@gmail.com> wrote:>
Chakolate wrote:>> > "stacey" <sjhust@mail.wsu.edu> wrote in news:1155313328.980450.301690@>> > 75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:>> >
It would be great if you could take 20 to 30 minutes of your time to>> >> offer your valued opinion. Participants who complete the survey will >> >> be>> >> entered into two raffles, each for an opportunity to win $50.>> >>
I am an Assistant Professor in the Edward R. Murrow School of>> >> Communication at Washington State University. This project has been>> >> reviewed and approved for human participation by the Washington State>> >> University Institutional Review Board to ensure this research is>> >> conducted in an ethical manner.>> >>
I don't think I'd mind too much taking such a survey, but 20-30 minutes>> > is a hell of a long survey. And the fact that this researcher is from >> > a>> > school of communications? I keep wondering, what's the point?>> >
Then again, I'm not sure who I think *should* be conducting such a>> > survey. I guess I pass.>> >
If anybody else does it, will you let us know how it goes?>>
It took me less than 10 minutes.>>
Many of the questions were in regard to media sources of>> information about health, which sources I use, how much reliance>> I place on them, whether I double check reports. Several>> questions about WHI and HPV vaccinations. Opinions on cultural>> and media influences on physical attractiveness. Demographic>> information.>>
I thought it was fairly reasonable, though I didn't like the way>> some questions were asked. But then I usually find a few to>> object to in any survey.>>
FurPaw>
Books were not listed as an information source! Yikes!
Ah, so I wasn't the only one to notice that! After the page that had you check which forms of media you use to get info, I listed books as "other", & found that a tad strange.
Priscilla Ballou 13 August 2006 23:43:49 [ permanent link ]
In article <LtKdneKyS5hJy0PZnZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d@adelphia.com>, "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphia.net> wrote:
"Priscilla Ballou" <vze23t8n@verizon.net> wrote in message > news:vze23t8n-0000A1.18175112082006@individual.net...
Books were not listed as an information source! Yikes!>
Ah, so I wasn't the only one to notice that! After the page that had you > check which forms of media you use to get info, I listed books as "other", & > found that a tad strange.
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please . Если Вы хотите пожаловаться на содержимое этой страницы, пожалуйста .
